Discuss the Airbnb case and say 
- who were the parties  - litigants and is this a pending case or an already decided litigation or are these  just parties at the pre-litigation stage and what it concerns 
- what are the key facts that have been established and are undisputed by the parties as you can recall them 
what is the  key legal issue in the instant case and where are the parties  domiciled at 
What is the effect of domicile on the territorial jurisdiction and what court would have the subject matter jurisdiction in the matter and where should the plaintiff file the action in the instant case if the defendant had been a Czech town and why 
who would  you prefer to represent and why and what would  your key arguments be
- who would be  the opposing party and what would you expect  their key arguments to be  and how easy or difficult would they be to rebut 
- what would  the governing legal sources be in an analogical Czech case 
- what are the key questions the court has to test 
- what are the options open to the parties and which would your preferred course of action be 
- what would the likely outcome of the case be 
 the court would dismiss the action as inadmissible - if so on what grounds and if not why 
Action would be admitted and the preliminary measure suspending the ordinance would be granted 
Action would be admitted to be tested on the merits but the preliminary injunction would not be granted suspending the ordinance