The suicide liability case

Who filed the action, what did the plaintiff allege, what were the key issues such as the proximity of the actions of the university or the failure to act in relation to the suicide of the student?

Would it be correct to say that in both cases the court held the university does not hold the duty of care to the students under standard circumstances and could you give an example of a situation in which the university would owe a student duty of care? 

How were the following concepts related to the two cases: equality act, reasonable accommodation measure, failure to prevent self harm, failure to oversee and ensure wellbeing.

What did the court hold in the two cases and how were the cases different and what is your legal opinion? 

In your opinion did the university owe any affirmative duties to the student and how would you translate “affirmative duties" /duty of availability, duty of reasonable accomodation, duty of supervision/ into Czech?

What is summary judgment and when would a court issue it, what does the in loco parentis doctrine mean and how is it applied, when would it be ok to argue that a test taking anxiety amounts to a disability and a reasonable accommodation measure must be taken? 
How is disclosure of mental health issues relevant to this case?