https://bit.ly/3VE6Dem
https://bit.ly/3VnyONp
https://bit.ly/3VIWDj5
https://bit.ly/4cmRsMq
https://bit.ly/45nxCye
https://bit.ly/3yWKkHU
https://bit.ly/4bXeTMs
https://bit.ly/4c0Fgkn
https://bit.ly/3XGiydl
https://bit.ly/4cl7aau
https://bit.ly/3Xo1qZr

andy1234567890 says:
Argh, we’re all doomed to become victims of our own self-perpetuating, racially negatively-reinforcing mindsets.

What a shame etc blah blah.

We need a nice big meteor to hit Earth and then perhaps the survivors will temporarily bond together, regardless of colour,status, age, gender etc. o.O

October 27, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Dana says:
Ah. An interesting look at race, for sure. While the study surely says something about race, I find it interesting that it only includes heterosexual encounters; strictly messages between men and women, not between anyone of the same ***. Why is that?

October 27, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Dana says:
Pardon me – I didn’t notice the link, taking you away from this page to gaytown. But, still, why a separate page for same-*** relations?

October 27, 2009 at 9:03 pm
Anna says:
I would love to see this combined with the words used in message data as well as age differences between sender and receiver.